雅思考試大作文范文經(jīng)濟類

雅思考試大作文范文經(jīng)濟類

　　為了幫助考生們更好地復習雅思考試,學習啦網(wǎng)為各位考生整理了雅思考試大作文范文2篇,供考生們參考使用。

　　雅思大作文范文：明星賺錢多是否應(yīng)該?

　　Salaries should reflect people’s dedication andjob responsibilities. However, sports figures, whodon’t benefit the community in general, earnmillions of dollars each. In my opinion this is wrong.Things should be done to change this situation.

　　If we take the example of a sport star such asTyson, it is hard for us to say in what way hebenefits the society. In fact, his disobeying game rules set a bad example for young people, andhis abandoned behavior encourages people to experiment with sex and violence. Besides, hisjob does not require special skills or years of training and education. Although he can entertainand excite audience, I do not think he is justified to receive so much money and his job can beconsidered essential.

　　On the other hand, most people in ‘ordinary’ professions like nurses, doctors and teachersearn only a small fraction of the income of these “stars”. However, if we give a careful look atthese professions, we will find that they not only require special skills and years of educationbut also help the people and the whole society. For instance, teachers disseminate knowledgeto the society; doctors and nurses give patients good medical care and prolong their life. Theyare much more useful, and actually more essential to society than sports personalities. Withoutthese ‘ordinary’ professions, our society would stop progressing. Their salaries should relate toskill, education or the value of the individual to society.

　　Things should be done to make salaries fairer. Huge amounts of money shall be given tomore deserving people. It seems that the only solution is to impose heavy taxes upon peoplewho earn excessively high salaries.

　　雅思大作文范文：大學生應(yīng)比非大學生掙錢多?

　　In our country, it is obvious now that the universitygraduates earn more money than non-graduates (afunny contrast in which It was opposite scenariowhen in 1970s china). I quite agree with thosegraduates who have paid a lot for their studies andexpect to make more for either himself or his family.However, it is not so optimistically for those whohope to make it. The critical career competitionmakes them frustrated due to many factors involved.

　　One of the utmost factors is they feel what they anticipate is not matching up with what theyhave found in reality. Many university graduates are not satisfied with what they get for whatthey have done. As a matter of fact, some of them expect so unrealistic that they immediatelylose the credit to the workforce they belong to. On contrary, some of the non-graduatestudents who are more realistic in career hunting tend to get more satisfied job compared withgraduates. Thus what really matters here in salary balance is how one can contribute to theorganization rather than what background they hold.

　　The tuition is really high in China. Many high quality students due to this have lost theiracademic pursuit. This is really shameful for a family or any government who initially shouldtake the burden for whatever reason is supposed to be. Any responsible government shouldinevitably take this burden and put more money in order to bring up better next generationfor the nation.

　　雅思大作文范文：學生應(yīng)該支付自己學習全部費用嗎?

　　Someconclude that college students should bearknowledge expenses for their higher learning on thegeneralization that college graduates usually receive higher salaries for similar jobs than thosewithout a college degree. We can not deny that higher level of education, indeed, do associatewith better income. Still, build on such fact alone, the conclusion remains questionable whenmore aspects are taken into consideration.

　　The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case thatpeople with higher education make more money than those less well-educated. But salary orincome is, in most cases, based on contributions made by employees to companies ororganizations in which they are employed. Statistics in the labor market indicate that peoplewith professional training tend to find jobs easier than college graduates do and that blue-collar workers who do not hold college degrees are becoming the hotties in the labor market.Employers prefer to hire and pay more to highly skilled and specially trained people rather thanfresh college graduates. In the auto industry, for instance, skilled technicians make two or threetimes more than their college educated counterparts who make the average salaries in othercompanies. And it is widely accepted that people's income is determined more by talent, hardwork, and willingness to take risks than solely by certain qualifications such as collegeeducation. Otherwise, the unemployment rate of college graduates would not be increasingevery year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of power in controlling the labormarket. Admittedly in some knowledge extensive field such as research, teaching, and practiceof law the labor force are primarily consists of highly educated professionals. But such peoplemake up only a fraction of the labor market and are thus unrepresentative of the wholeemployment in general.

　　Considering the goal of education, we find that it is even more problematic for the countryto throw all the responsibility of financing college education to college students. The goal ofhigher education of a nation is to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual andprofessional capacity of its labor force, thereby increasing the competency of the nation inthe global economy. As tax payers, parents all contributes to the education system andcountry in various ways. It is only reasonable and necessary that the country gives someforms of financially assistance to students to ease the burden of rising education costs. Suchhelp should go to not only students from needy or impoverished families but also outstandingstudents from affluent backgrounds. Doing so can significantly boost the motivation ofchildren from millions of families to engage in higher level of study. It is understandable thatthe general quality of people in a country will improve and its economy will benefit both nowand in years to follow.

　　If the burden of supporting children's higher education is dumped on parents and students,thousands of brilliant students will be deprived of chances to pursue their academicinspiration. Among those who suffer would definitely be future great scientists,businessmanagers, artists and statesmen. The loss will be disastrous and irreversible.

　　In conclusion, the idea that students should also pay the full cost of their study is wrongand harmful because it is wrong to assume that higher education necessarily equalize highincome. Moreover, it is in the best interest of a nation to take responsibility in financing collegeeducation so that the goal of higher education will be better met.